Closed kp-121 closed 2 years ago
OK, after doing another REALLY long one the first pair (frames 1&2) seem wrong (maybe replicated frames). After that, they seem reasonable.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 11:23 AM Kris Price @.***> wrote:
I've changed how we name the extracted frames, but the old timestamp ordering should've worked. I'm going to leave this open until we either find out why the ordering is off or we don't see the problem any more.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mI-PIV/app/issues/398, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASRTNWIMHHQ76FVK4EDPS5LV4IZXVANCNFSM6AAAAAAQDOP43M . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
It's most likely replicated frames caused by converting 1-based to 0-based and back again. This helps a lot!
I've changed how we name the extracted frames, but the old timestamp ordering should've worked. I'm going to leave this open until we either find out why the ordering is off or we don't see the problem any more.