Closed TravelTrader closed 4 years ago
Hello @TravelTrader, Thanks for your kind feedback.
I'm no expert at all in image processing, but:
quality
and window_size
, have you tried a different format
? Remember that these parameters are only available using the phantomjs
rendererimagemagick
could be used after webscreenshot
to enhance the problem areas on images ?Cheers.
Thanks @maaaaz. Good ideas. I tried around but could not improve it.
For me it's a miracle why a screenshot on my desktop is much better than a screenshot using your library and a better solution... maybe it's because the code runs on a server without a window manager?
Thanks @maaaaz. Good ideas. I tried around but could not improve it.
Argh! Sad to hear.
For me it's a miracle why a screenshot on my desktop is much better than a screenshot using your library and a better solution... maybe it's because the code runs on a server without a window manager?
I really don't know.
One other idea is that you can try to add here a phantomjs
zoomfactor
statement like for instance page.zoomFactor = 1.25;
(125% zoom)
First I have to say that it's a great tool. I am so happy that I found it!
Now I need it for a screenshot where I use the cv2 library on it. And the quality leads to about 10% errors. Here you can find a part of it.
My settings are
Of course, I tried around with the numbers. But with highest quality the window size does not change a lot.
Any ideas or hints? Thanks!