search

maansthoernvik / rabbitmq_client

Client for a RabbitMQ server.
MIT License
9 stars 5 forks source link

Allow nacks #27

Closed AntonLydike closed 2 years ago

AntonLydike commented 2 years ago

There is currently no way to handle sending a nack()

Maybe the consumer should send a nack() when he recieves an error from the callback? I think that that would be a pretty good start.

Maybe I can get a quick PR in later this week?

maansthoernvik commented 2 years ago

I opted to leave the message handling purely in that hands of the callback implementer. My reasoning is that I do not want to interfere in what action they may want to take for a particular message. There are more parameters to add related to message handling, but I will add these on request. Feel free to open more issues if you need some additional control.