Closed papsti closed 2 years ago
Thank you for using master. I believe I know the feature that introduced this bug. I'll fix it on tmb-condense and test if it fixes your issue.
I've got a minimal example and was correct about the cause -- at least in my minimal version of the bug.
I have a fix ... testing now. Unfortunately it is going to go into the R0/Gbar commits/push, so I've still got some testing to do. But my understanding is that this will be fine.
Thanks for finding this.
Yes, all good! master
doesn't have this bug and works for my current purposes 🎉
I've pushed my fix to tmb-condense
. I'm not going to merge to master until you let me know that it is safe.
There seems to be a bug that has occurred somewhere between the latest commits on the
master
andtmb-condense
branches (2c512006 and 8b1a0373, respectively). I believemaster
was last synced withtmb-condense
on 10 June (97394ec3), so the bug seems to have been introduced intotmb-condense
after that.I have a bunch of code that runs a calibration and forecast ensemble: @stevencarlislewalker, you can find it in the
macpan_forecast
repo on thesw_debug
branch, just source therun_this.R
script.When I run this script on a
McMasterPandemic
install frommaster
, everything looks fine in the plot that appears. However, when I run it on an install fromtmb-condense
, the lagged difference variables are all 0 in the forecast ensemble on dates after the calibration end date (last observation date).This isn't urgent for me as the install from the
master
branch works just fine.