search

mac-zhou / midea-ac-py

Home Assistant Custom Integration for Midea Group(Hualing, Senville, Klimaire, AirCon, Century, Pridiom, Thermocore, Comfee, Toshiba, Carrier, Goodman, Friedrich, Samsung, Kenmore, Trane, Lennox, LG and much more) Air Conditioners via LAN.
MIT License
519 stars 101 forks source link

Warning message from HA suggesting alternative call #216

Open ryanandres opened 11 months ago

ryanandres commented 11 months ago

Describe the bug Warning message from HA suggesting alternative call

Screenshots / Logs / Pcap File Logger: homeassistant.helpers.entity Source: helpers/entity.py:565 First occurred: 10:24:17 AM (1 occurrences) Last logged: 10:24:17 AM

Entity climate.garage_ac (<class 'custom_components.midea_ac.climate.MideaClimateACDevice'>) is using self.async_update_ha_state(), without enabling force_update. Instead it should use self.async_write_ha_state(), please report it to the custom integration author.

Versions (版本信息)

mill1000 commented 11 months ago

This issue is resolved in my updated fork mill1000/midea-ac-py

ryanandres commented 11 months ago

Excellent! I just switched over. Thank you!

mill1000 commented 11 months ago

Make sure you update msmart as well to get all the features.

e.g. In your HA system/container/env

pip install git+https://github.com/mill1000/midea-msmart.git
ryanandres commented 11 months ago

Make sure you update msmart as well to get all the features.

e.g. In your HA system/container/env

pip install git+https://github.com/mill1000/midea-msmart.git@future

I did this and now my cool mode is not an option in the drop down

SmartSelect_20230715_120542_Home Assistant.jpg

mill1000 commented 11 months ago

Ah, that can happen if (for some reason) the device doesn't report the correct capabilities.

You can work around this by manually adding the cool mode in the integration configuration like so image

ryanandres commented 11 months ago

That worked! And no warnings or errors in my logs.

Off topic, but have you fixed the issue with devices being unresponsive due to having multiple client instances?

In my case I'm using Carrier's app and HA... https://github.com/mac-zhou/midea-ac-py/issues/95#issuecomment-1631598926

mill1000 commented 11 months ago

Unfortunately, most of the underlying network code is unchanged so this will probably still be an issue

What are you using the carrier app for that this extension can't do?

ryanandres commented 11 months ago

I'm using it to configure schedules and I'm not aware of this extension supporting it.

ryanandres commented 11 months ago

I know that sounds idiotic considering I can use HA to automate my own schedules. Now I'm trying to recall exactly why I relied on the carrier app... I think a while ago the extension or my system was not reliable so I depended on carrier's cloud service. I need to reconsider this

mill1000 commented 11 months ago

| I'm using it to configure schedules and I'm not aware of this extension supporting it. ... | I know that sounds idiotic considering I can use HA to automate my own schedules. Now I'm trying to recall exactly why I relied on the carrier app... I think a while ago the extension or my system was not reliable so I depended on carrier's cloud service. I need to reconsider this

Hahaha that's alright. Might be worth ditching the Carrier app for a little bit just to see if it makes the integration more reliable. If its still flaky then the integration won't be of much use will it.