Closed mjackson closed 12 years ago
Yes, I would be opposed. I'm sorry, but I'd rather not deal with older versions of Rails.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Michael Jackson notifications@github.comwrote:
It looks like you're no longer supporting Rails 2.x. For example, you're using Rails::Engine which, AFAIK, is a Rails 3 thing. Would you be opposed to adding back support for it?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/maccman/sprockets-commonjs/issues/12.
Alex MacCaw
+12147175129 @maccman
You and me both. :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Alex MacCaw notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes, I would be opposed. I'm sorry, but I'd rather not deal with older versions of Rails.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Michael Jackson notifications@github.comwrote:
It looks like you're no longer supporting Rails 2.x. For example, you're using Rails::Engine which, AFAIK, is a Rails 3 thing. Would you be opposed to adding back support for it?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/maccman/sprockets-commonjs/issues/12.
Alex MacCaw
+12147175129 @maccman
http://alexmaccaw.com — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Although the edge
branch doesn't use Engines (but requires a up-to-date version of Sprockets)
Right on. Thanks for the quick reply. I can totally understand your desire to look forward instead of back. I'll check out the edge version and see if I can make it work with our rails stack. Thanks!
It looks like you're no longer supporting Rails 2.x. For example, you're using Rails::Engine which, AFAIK, is a Rails 3 thing. Would you be opposed to adding back support for it?