machinekit / machinekit-docs

Machinekit website
http://www.machinekit.io
16 stars 54 forks source link

FDM/FFF (3D printing) documentation #177

Open machinekoder opened 8 years ago

machinekoder commented 8 years ago

There should be a section about how to use Machinekit for 3D printing. The FDM standard should also move into the docs: https://github.com/strahlex/Machinekit-FDM-Standard

luminize commented 8 years ago

That would only make sense imo if the configurations are "stock" machinekit.

the-snowwhite commented 8 years ago

I Agree with you both. For mere 3d printing is not just a "toy" I have seen 3d Glass printing and 3d Bridge building with robot welders.

But this is not My Call as I was not part of the deciding around the externalisation of the qt stuff. On 24 Jun 2016 5:12 p.m., "Bas de Bruijn" notifications@github.com wrote:

That would only make sense imo if the configurations are "stock" machinekit.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit-docs/issues/177#issuecomment-228372778, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AKifnGrvmC4dvt03zwWu8bX9VgKF_OgEks5qO_PBgaJpZM4I9zZY .

luminize commented 8 years ago

On 24 Jun 2016, at 19:13, Michael Brown notifications@github.com wrote:

But this is not My Call as I was not part of the deciding around the externalisation of the qt stuff.

I'm sorry, I don't see the connection. Qt has nothing to do with configurations or HAL

cdsteinkuehler commented 8 years ago

On 6/24/2016 10:12 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:

That would only make sense imo if the configurations are "stock" machinekit.

I think Alexander's standards for FDM setups and his example configurations should migrate into the machinekit repo and become part of the standard release. IMHO, the existing FDM examples should also migrate to using the FDM standards and possibly the python HAL setup.

Charles Steinkuehler charles@steinkuehler.net

the-snowwhite commented 8 years ago

What i remember the issue was about not adding more gui stuff at that time, because of the build system being very strained.

I tried to add some qvcp configs

On 24 Jun 2016, at 20:23, Bas de Bruijn notifications@github.com wrote:

On 24 Jun 2016, at 19:13, Michael Brown notifications@github.com wrote:

But this is not My Call as I was not part of the deciding around the externalisation of the qt stuff.

I'm sorry, I don't see the connection. Qt has nothing to do with configurations or HAL — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit-docs/issues/177#issuecomment-228422223, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AKifnEBxAI49r3Eopu08kuZuCbBWEBYqks5qPCCygaJpZM4I9zZY.

machinekoder commented 8 years ago

To clarify: The config itself is not UI specific, I See no problem in adding additional configs to the Machinekit repo.

cdsteinkuehler commented 8 years ago

I agree with adding 3DP content to the docs as well as adding some stock configurations that use the FDM-Standard and/or migrating the existing 3DP configs to use the FDM-Standard.