Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
This is not a priority for me now.
If you are interested, send me the changes and I'll update the package.
Original comment by hari.swa...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2010 at 2:11
never mind. I already got the code from james to make the cover flow look more
like B&N. I'll merge it in the next build. It probably won't cover all your
issues. But this is the best we can do right now :)
Original comment by hari.swa...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2010 at 10:56
cover flow modified in version 1.3
Original comment by hari.swa...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2010 at 9:04
Thank you, I like it! Still bumpy due to refreshing the eInk display, but the
other aspects are fine. Good on you!
Original comment by dominik....@googlemail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 12:07
Speaking of which... Hari, do you have any idea why the active cover in cover
flow looks worse (more pixelated) than when shown by the reader? This is true
at least for me with covers pre-scaled to a height of 144 pixels (but I think
the same is true for larger icons). To put it more clearly, the "active cover"
is the one shown enlarged, i.e., with a height of 144 pixels. I'd expect that
not to undergo any scaling if it already is 144 pixels (and to not look as bad
as it does if scaled down from a larger size), so it should be on par
quality-wise with the one displayed by the B&N Reader app.
Original comment by mgoetze2...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 12:29
eink is refreshed only when the scrolling stops, just like in the stock
library.
the main difference is B&N is using their own gallery class and I'm using the
android one.
Original comment by hari.swa...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 1:21
the image quality could be due to some of the parameters set in the gallery
class.
Also, to avoid extra calculations, I'm using the smaller icon as the base and
resizing the selected one each time to 144 pixels. Could be due to that as
well.
Just have to play around with the CustomGallery & ImageAdapter classes and see
which looks better.
Original comment by hari.swa...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 1:26
That's strange. On my unit the eink is refreshed immediately. Even if I tap on
the cover leftmost or rightmost, so it comes to the foreground, skipping the
cover between, you can see this cover (the one in between) getting highlighted
on the eink screen. Just took a video clip, to make it more clearly.
Couldn' test B&N gallery cause I don't have any B&N books anymore...
Just tried with a second nook: the same thing.
I've noticed on both units: tapping on the leftmost/rightmost cover sometimes
(1 out of 100 attempts) skips highlighting the cover in between
Original comment by dominik....@googlemail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 2:02
Attachments:
> (1 out of 100 attempts)
err... should be 1 out of 10...
Original comment by dominik....@googlemail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 2:04
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dominik....@googlemail.com
on 1 Sep 2010 at 12:51Attachments: