Closed valpackett closed 11 years ago
Thanks for putting this together. Does the code provide for a way to compile a non-emberized template?
I see @window.Emblem.precompile @window.Ember.Handlebars, data
, what would be nice is if you could detect if the filename had the pattern of .raw.emblem
, which would trigger it to pass @window.Handlebars
instead of Ember.Handlebars, which is how a raw Handlebars template is rendered. Should be pretty trivial since all the other hard parts are in place... would you mind putting that in there?
Perhaps another idea would be if you don't provide an Ember path, all .emblem templates are assumed to be raw handlebars, rather than necessitating .raw.emblem to be in the name. I'd be happy w/ that, but you guys are more familiar with the brunch patterns than I
I'll do this in my fork, good idea
On Feb 22, 2013, at 5:46 AM, Alex Matchneer notifications@github.com wrote:
Perhaps another idea would be if you don't provide an Ember path, all .emblem templates are assumed to be raw handlebars, rather than necessitating .raw.emblem to be in the name. I'd be happy w/ that, but you guys are more familiar with the brunch patterns than I
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Could you update the test suite to test for both emberized and raw handlebars? Should be pretty trivial but we need that in there as a baseline.
yo yo yo what's the status on all this?
I think it should include default dependencies and use the path options as overrides. Less configuration for noobs.
@myfreeweb is this ready to merge?
yes
On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Alex Matchneer notifications@github.com wrote:
@myfreeweb is this ready to merge?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
and fix the readme and stuff.