Closed Kerl13 closed 4 years ago
@Kerl13 It seems that the warning is a consequence of upgrading cvxpy
to version 1.1.5
. All tests pass, the results of your problem seem all in order. I wouldn't worry too much, but if you want to, it might be a nice little "debugging" feature to enable users to pass a --verbose
flag down to cvxpy
. What do you think?
Ok good, I won't worry then ;)
I've just realized it's already possible to pass the verbose flag like so:
params = Params(sys_type=Type.ALGEBRAIC)
params.verbose
spec.run_singular_tuner(z, params=params)
The Params
class already has a .verbose
attribute that is set to False
by default.
Not sure how to interpret the results though:
ECOS 2.0.7 - (C) embotech GmbH, Zurich Switzerland, 2012-15. Web: www.embotech.com/ECOS
It pcost dcost gap pres dres k/t mu step sigma IR | BT
0 +0.000e+00 -1.546e+00 +8e+00 6e-01 2e-01 1e+00 1e+00 --- --- 0 0 - | - -
1 -3.836e-01 -7.435e-01 +2e+00 4e-01 8e-02 5e-01 2e-01 0.7833 3e-02 1 1 1 | 1 1
2 +8.545e-01 +7.957e-01 +4e-01 1e-01 3e-02 3e-01 5e-02 0.7833 5e-02 1 1 1 | 2 1
3 +1.214e+00 +1.205e+00 +9e-02 4e-02 6e-03 7e-02 1e-02 0.7833 2e-02 1 1 1 | 1 1
4 +1.353e+00 +1.353e+00 +2e-02 9e-03 2e-03 2e-02 2e-03 0.7833 9e-03 1 1 1 | 1 1
5 +1.377e+00 +1.377e+00 +4e-03 2e-03 4e-04 5e-03 6e-04 0.7833 1e-02 2 1 1 | 1 1
6 +1.384e+00 +1.384e+00 +1e-03 6e-04 1e-04 1e-03 1e-04 0.7833 5e-02 2 1 1 | 2 1
7 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-04 1e-04 3e-05 3e-04 3e-05 0.7833 5e-02 1 1 1 | 2 1
8 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +6e-05 3e-05 6e-06 7e-05 8e-06 0.7833 1e-02 1 1 1 | 1 1
9 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-05 7e-06 1e-06 2e-05 2e-06 0.7833 9e-03 1 1 1 | 1 1
10 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-06 2e-06 4e-07 4e-06 4e-07 0.7833 5e-02 2 0 0 | 2 1
11 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +8e-07 5e-07 1e-07 1e-06 1e-07 0.7833 5e-02 1 0 1 | 2 1
12 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-07 1e-07 2e-08 2e-07 2e-08 0.7833 1e-02 1 1 0 | 1 1
13 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +4e-08 3e-08 5e-09 5e-08 5e-09 0.7833 9e-03 1 1 0 | 1 1
14 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-08 1e-08 2e-09 2e-08 2e-09 0.6266 5e-02 1 0 1 | 2 2
15 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-09 2e-09 4e-10 5e-09 4e-10 0.7833 9e-03 0 0 0 | 1 1
16 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-09 9e-10 2e-10 2e-09 2e-10 0.6266 5e-02 0 1 1 | 2 2
17 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-10 2e-10 4e-11 4e-10 4e-11 0.7833 9e-03 0 1 1 | 1 1
18 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-10 1e-10 3e-11 2e-10 2e-11 0.7833 5e-01 1 1 0 | 7 1
19 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-11 3e-11 6e-12 5e-11 5e-12 0.7833 9e-03 1 0 1 | 1 1
20 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-11 1e-11 2e-12 2e-11 2e-12 0.6266 5e-02 1 1 1 | 2 2
21 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +6e-12 4e-12 1e-12 7e-12 7e-13 0.6266 5e-02 1 0 1 | 2 2
22 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +5e-12 4e-12 8e-13 6e-12 6e-13 0.2053 5e-02 0 0 1 | 2 7
23 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-12 8e-13 2e-13 1e-12 1e-13 0.7833 9e-03 1 1 0 | 1 1
24 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +6e-13 5e-13 4e-14 3e-13 7e-14 0.7833 9e-03 0 1 0 | 1 1
25 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +5e-13 5e-13 4e-14 3e-13 6e-14 0.1051 2e-01 0 0 1 | 4 10
26 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +5e-13 5e-13 4e-14 3e-13 6e-14 0.0220 6e-01 0 1 0 | 8 17
27 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-13 2e-13 8e-15 6e-14 2e-14 0.7833 9e-03 0 0 0 | 1 1
28 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +8e-14 2e-13 5e-15 4e-14 1e-14 0.4010 5e-02 0 0 0 | 2 4
29 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +7e-14 3e-13 5e-15 4e-14 8e-15 0.0538 8e-01 1 0 1 | 12 13
30 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +6e-14 2e-13 4e-15 4e-14 7e-15 0.1314 1e-01 0 1 1 | 3 9
31 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +8e-14 2e-13 4e-15 6e-14 1e-14 0.9791 1e+00 1 1 0 | 24 0
32 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +4e-14 4e-14 1e-15 2e-14 5e-15 0.9791 2e-01 0 1 0 | 4 0
33 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-14 4e-14 8e-16 2e-14 4e-15 0.3208 4e-01 0 0 0 | 6 5
34 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-14 3e-14 6e-16 2e-14 3e-15 0.9791 7e-01 0 0 0 | 9 0
35 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-14 2e-14 4e-16 1e-14 1e-15 0.5013 1e-01 0 0 0 | 3 3
36 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +4e-15 2e-14 1e-16 5e-15 5e-16 0.6266 1e-01 0 0 0 | 3 2
37 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-15 2e-14 1e-16 3e-15 3e-16 0.7833 7e-01 0 0 0 | 9 1
38 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-15 1e-14 1e-16 2e-15 2e-16 0.3208 4e-01 1 0 0 | 6 5
39 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +1e-15 1e-14 9e-17 2e-15 2e-16 0.0841 8e-01 1 0 0 | 12 11
40 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +9e-16 8e-15 7e-17 1e-15 1e-16 0.6266 4e-01 0 0 0 | 6 2
41 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +4e-16 3e-15 9e-17 5e-16 6e-17 0.6266 5e-02 0 0 0 | 2 2
42 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +4e-16 3e-15 0e+00 5e-16 6e-17 0.0220 9e-01 0 0 0 | 18 17
43 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-16 2e-15 9e-17 3e-16 3e-17 0.4010 3e-01 0 0 0 | 5 4
44 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +3e-16 2e-15 1e-16 3e-16 4e-17 0.2053 5e-01 0 0 0 | 7 7
45 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-16 1e-15 2e-16 2e-16 3e-17 0.3208 3e-01 0 0 0 | 5 5
46 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-16 1e-15 2e-16 2e-16 3e-17 0.2053 5e-01 0 0 0 | 7 7
47 +1.386e+00 +1.386e+00 +2e-16 9e-16 1e-16 2e-16 2e-17 0.5013 5e-01 0 0 0 | 7 3
Combined backtracking failed 0 90 0 0 sigma 1
Combined line search failed, recovering best iterate (40) and stopping.
Close to OPTIMAL (within feastol=7.6e-15, reltol=6.8e-16, abstol=9.4e-16).
Runtime: 0.001819 seconds.
To me "Close to OPTIMAL" and the given tolerances look good.
Right, I've forgot we already have that ;)
I do not have to worry about this message. In any case, you can decrease the accuracy, increase the number of iterations, or use a fixed-size tuner.
That's ok for me, thanks for the feedback
Since recently I get warnings systematically when running a tuner, even on rather simple grammars. For instance with the example from the readme:
Should I be worried about them?