Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the fix! I'll merge it into the next version of the tool.
Original comment by pmo...@gmail.com
on 28 Aug 2012 at 11:43
This issue was closed by revision 887d5de11a79.
Original comment by pmo...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2012 at 10:10
Hi Peter!
Why did you not commit this fix in the 3x branch?
Regards, Alain
Original comment by sahli.al...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2012 at 10:16
G'day Alain,
I'm planning on merging it back as part of the work on issue
110<http://code.google.com/p/alfresco-bulk-filesystem-import/issues/detail?id=11
0>
[1]
(which also requires some back-merging).
Cheers,
Peter
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/alfresco-bulk-filesystem-import/issues/detail?id=110
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, <
alfresco-bulk-filesystem-import@googlecode.com> wrote:
Original comment by pmo...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2012 at 5:33
Ok, thanks for the quick answer!
Cheers,
Alain
Original comment by sahli.al...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2012 at 5:35
Note: I had to reverse this change after noticing some problems around
out-of-order execution and difficulties in stopping the thread pool. Note the
following text from the Javadocs [1] (emphasis added):
"New tasks submitted in method execute(java.lang.Runnable) will be rejected
_*when the Executor has been shut down*_, and also when the Executor uses
finite bounds for both maximum threads and work queue capacity, and is
saturated."
[1]
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor
.html
Original comment by pmo...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2013 at 6:18
I think the only option if you're importing an exceptionally large folder
hierarchy will be to throw more memory at Alfresco.
Original comment by pmo...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2013 at 6:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sahli.al...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 10:08