Open wangjiawen2013 opened 5 years ago
And, can I build signal track to obtain FE signal without --SPMR ?
When building signal track with MACS2, the FE signal in genome range where the coverage is very low will become very significant, because the denominator is near zero in that range. Could you assign a weight to the low coverage range to avoid this artifact ?
Sorry, logLR signal has already done that.
When building signal tracks, if you used 'bdgcmp' command, you can assign a bigger pseudocount to overcome such issue -- "-p PSEUDOCOUNT".
I have my own bedGraph files for control and treatment. There are zeros in control file and I would like to generate ppois signal track (-m ppois). So I applied "-p PSEUDOCOUNT" and tried a few pseudocount 0.00001, 0.05, 0.1... But none of them actually works. The following error always appears: Exception AssertionError: 'Lambda must > 0, however we got 0' in 'MACS2.Prob.poisson_cdf' ignored Could you please help? Thanks!
@YiqunCao See my reply at #265
When building signal track with MACS2, the FE signal in genome range where the coverage is very low will become very significant, because the denominator is near zero in that range. Could you assign a weight to the low coverage range to avoid this artifact ?