search

madMAx43v3r / chia-plotter

Apache License 2.0
2.27k stars 662 forks source link

2x E5-2694A v4 + 384 gb ram + 4x 2tb nvme PHASE 1 = 2400 SECOND!!! #381

Open merakliseyit opened 3 years ago

merakliseyit commented 3 years ago

My server is 2x 2697A v4 + 384gb ddr 4 2133 mhz 4x 2tb nvme I'm running madmax on windows. (I don't know anything about linux, ubuntu) phase 1 duration is 2400 seconds.this is very bad I tried many alternatives. 60 thread temp1=nvme / temp2=nvme temp1=nvme / temp2= ramdisk temp1=ramdisk / temp2=ramdisk There is no difference. even when i use ramdisk the time is extended by 4 minutes. what is the reason of this? I've seen it finish in 1800 seconds with servers much older than my server.where is the error please help

madMAx43v3r commented 3 years ago

ntfs? if yes, use ext4

merakliseyit commented 3 years ago

ntfs? evet ise, ext4 kullanın

I assume you are talking about ramdisk? ı use imdisk. Options include ntfs,fat,fat32,exfat. Do you have any suggestions?

merakliseyit commented 3 years ago

ntfs? evet ise, ext4 kullanın

After some research, I think ext4 is used in linux and ubuntu...

I have very little knowledge about linux and ubuntu. Can you suggest a document or video about installing ubuntu and madmax?

kryptoklob commented 3 years ago

@merakliseyit sorry, but this isn't the place to ask about generic Ubuntu/linux questions. Here's something to get you going, but if you're not familiar with the linux ecosystem you're not going to be up and running and compiling without a lot of learning

dmontes46 commented 3 years ago

having same results, on linux i have great time, on windows using imdisk, did you find the issue ?

thanks

piotrasd commented 3 years ago

RAM in dual channel - best, difference is big from single mode second for me 24 threads or 48 threads is much more worst than 12 - is perfect NVME + RAM disk - 1550sec

ataa commented 3 years ago

Are you on Windows Server? There are some reports of poor plotting performance on Windows server.

378

dmontes46 commented 3 years ago

Hi

Yes on windows server 2016, it seems that the ramdisk doest give any performance

ataa @.***> escreveu em dom., 13/06/2021 às 23:57 :

Are you on Windows Server? There are some reports of poor plotting performance on Windows server.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/madMAx43v3r/chia-plotter/issues/381#issuecomment-860281650, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOEL3WTQZ7VSU543C6OHCBLTSUZVPANCNFSM46THEUOA .

vmenshov commented 3 years ago

ntfs? evet ise, ext4 kullanın

I assume you are talking about ramdisk? ı use imdisk. Options include ntfs,fat,fat32,exfat. Do you have any suggestions?

Maybe try to use OFSMount instead of imdisk? Or try -u 512? I have 2x boost on phase 1 using -u 512 instead of -u 256.