Open nickrobinson251 opened 5 years ago
This is a great idea. I wouldn't do this instead of but in addition to the methods defined internally, in a separate file. (It's better not to be too dependent on dependencies.)
I'd welcome this as a PR; it would be an easy project for someone looking to contribute to this package.
✋ I can take a look at adding this. I'd like to work on getting the CI passing first.
I wonder if rather than this package defining
impute
andimpute_missing
it would be instead be worth implementing the interface provided byImpute.jl
?One possible way could be to define a
LowRank <: Imputor
and extendimpute(A, imp::LowRank)
along the lines ofHere are examples of current imputors :)