Suggestion: allow cacheless configuration

madhuneal / lusca-cache

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/lusca-cache

0 stars 0 forks source link

Suggestion: allow cacheless configuration #98

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

IMO, web proxy with null cache is clean and reasonable enough.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by radiant@aol.jp on 27 Mar 2010 at 6:17

Attachments:

nocache.patch

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Well, I've been thinking about changing this default for quite some time. The 
problem
is that I want Lusca to be an easy replacement for squid-2 / squid-3. Changing 
this
may upset some users migrating to/from it.

So I'm not going to commit this just for now. I'll keep it in mind for the 
future though!

Thanks!

Original comment by adrian.c...@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2010 at 10:19