First of all, I'm really grateful for your work! It looks amazing!
The thing with FreeBSD (I'm almost sure any other *nix except Linux) is that it places bash under /usr/local/bin. I just glanced the scripts in this repo and they don't seam like a bash specific ones, so I was wondering if you would be OK with using /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash? I would check it works, create PR and so on, I'm just curious if you would accept it? In the case I fail to make it POSIX compliant, would you mind if I send PR which uses "!/usr/bin/env bash" in the scripts?
In any case it would be nice to have a Makefile (I know how to write the one compatible with BSD and GNU implementation) that takes care of "make install". I can send that change in the PR, too, if you agree.
Anyway, as rofi and jack user, I can totally see the benefit of having this repo as FreeBSD port/package. Thank you again!
First of all, I'm really grateful for your work! It looks amazing!
The thing with FreeBSD (I'm almost sure any other *nix except Linux) is that it places bash under /usr/local/bin. I just glanced the scripts in this repo and they don't seam like a bash specific ones, so I was wondering if you would be OK with using /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash? I would check it works, create PR and so on, I'm just curious if you would accept it? In the case I fail to make it POSIX compliant, would you mind if I send PR which uses "!/usr/bin/env bash" in the scripts?
In any case it would be nice to have a Makefile (I know how to write the one compatible with BSD and GNU implementation) that takes care of "make install". I can send that change in the PR, too, if you agree.
Anyway, as rofi and jack user, I can totally see the benefit of having this repo as FreeBSD port/package. Thank you again!