Closed corot closed 3 years ago
You are right with the preempting. I like your proposals. This could be done in another PR, or? What do you think @dorezyuk @corot ?
You are right with the preempting. I like your proposals. This could be done in another PR, or? What do you think @dorezyuk @corot ?
I'm done with the requested changes; just need to test I'll commit now, before testing, so u can judge
You are right with the preempting. I like your proposals. This could be done in another PR, or? What do you think @dorezyuk @corot ?
I'm done with the requested changes; just need to test I'll commit now, before testing, so u can judge
It looks good now - the only thing I could wish for are some tests for this class;)
As I mentioned in the issue, we need to run the replanning in its own thread
Interestingly, it also seems to fix #259 and #260 (both the same issue, I think)
@echo4echo, @r0gi, would be really great if you can give a try to this branch and see if it fixes the issue you reported; thanks in advance