Closed corot closed 1 year ago
Why would this be best implemented as a service? It might take a considerable amount of time to run (if tolerance is large?) maybe there are intermediate information to transmit in the future to allow the user to abort the search?
Why would this be best implemented as a service? It might take a considerable amount of time to run (if tolerance is large?) maybe there are intermediate information to transmit in the future to allow the user to abort the search?
sorry, I answered on the wrong place 3 weeks ago!!! :see_no_evil:
good question; 2 reasons:
@corot Do you have a benchmark how long the service call will take with the search implementation of #317 ? Otherwise looks good to me.
@corot Do you have a benchmark how long the service call will take with the search implementation of #317 ? Otherwise looks good to me.
Yes, it's very fast; we call it at high frequency w/o any problem
New MBF service to add to mbf_costmap_nav: it goes in the line of the suggestion at issue #8; but less ambitious by now. But we can add other services that for example finds a valid pose within an area.
The implementation is on PR #317