Open IanFiretoys opened 3 years ago
Hi @IanFiretoys. Thank you for your report. To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:
Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance
- upcoming 2.4.x release
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
Please, add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this
Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.
:warning: According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.
:clock10: You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
:telephone_receiver: The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.
:movie_camera: You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel
:pencil2: Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance - upcoming 2.4.x release
Hi @IanFiretoys. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento instance for you.
Hi @IanFiretoys, here is your Magento Instance: https://55b48bb2b0ec3ac5da9a86b6cff3ac29-2-4-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering Admin access: https://55b48bb2b0ec3ac5da9a86b6cff3ac29-2-4-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin_f237 Login: 65d9ab91 Password: f3957da0aada
Hi @engcom-November. Thank you for working on this issue. In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
[ ] 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).Details
If the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid
will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid
appears.
[ ] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description
label to the issue by yourself.
[ ] 3. Add Component: XXXXX
label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[ ] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop
branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance
to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop
branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x
.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
[ ] 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed
once verification is complete.
[ ] 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
Verified the issue on Magento 2.4-develop branch and the issue is reproducible with above steps performed. And the issue is also reproducible in below scenario as well: Steps to reproduce:
:white_check_mark: Jira issue https://jira.corp.magento.com/browse/AC-1332 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.
:white_check_mark: Confirmed by @engcom-November. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-November, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.
I initially thought this might be related to the fact that there are no "use default value" options for these images, so might have been left out of some check when saving in a new storeview, but as this happens to "design > display product options" which does have a use default value checkbox that doesn't make sense.
Hi @IanFiretoys ,
Thanks for your reporting and collaboration. We have re-verified the issue in latest 2.4-develop instance and the issue is reproducible. Kindly refer the screenshots.
Steps to reproduce:
Note: There is no issue while deleting image if "Use Default Value" for Price field is unchecked when scope is set to "All Store Views"
Thanks.
Preconditions (*)
Steps to reproduce (*)
Expected result (*)
Actual result (*)
this is strange that it happens when the price has changed, as it would almost make sense that if you changed something else on entity_varchar that it might create extra rows for other items on entity_varchar, but given that price is on its own table it doesn't make sense. nothing else on entity_varchar seems to be split off for the example product except for "display product options in" in the design section.
Please provide Severity assessment for the Issue as Reporter. This information will help during Confirmation and Issue triage processes.