Open nydel opened 6 years ago
Would you check this with version 0.3.2 of Tootstream? The streaming API changed for Mastodon.py and that may solve the issue.
Thanks!
new ve & new pip installation -- after calling notes (a few notes are displayed then...)
note: 70386
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/nydel/ve/ts/bin/tootstream", line 11, in
So it looks like 'created_at' isn''t getting set for that notification. Hurm. That's strange.
Would it be possible to run the following:
python -m pdb `which tootstream`
, type "c" to continue, type note
and then type p note['status']
to see what is getting returned?
note: 70386
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/pdb.py", line 1661, in main
pdb._runscript(mainpyfile)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/pdb.py", line 1542, in _runscript
self.run(statement)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/bdb.py", line 431, in run
exec(cmd, globals, locals)
File "
/home/nydel/ve/ts/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tootstream/toot.py(1114)note() -> tz_info = note['status']['created_at'].tzinfo (Pdb) p note['status'] None (Pdb) p note['created_at'] datetime.datetime(2018, 1, 23, 3, 11, 36, 214000, tzinfo=tzutc()) (Pdb)
09773300428952175019fac06e2441ce45fa4195 adds a generic exception handling routine for crashes like this. It's not the best solution but it should prevent it from crashing. I'll still give this a peek for future versions.
Are we still having errors with this? I haven't seen anything on my end.
tootstream crashes when encountering what i have referred to as "blank notifications" ... here is the traceback:
(having called 'notes' from the REPL)
note: 70376 @(user-removed) favorited your status: βΊ:0 β₯:1 id:23 vis:π via β Tootdon β 2018-01-23 02:06:41 (19 hours ago) @(user-removed) you make good points and are clearly thoughtful and think critically. and my further thoughts are - what you say suggests a problem/solution which is better than my simple whinging about progress not being made fast enough. moving from feedlot chicken-nugget tv dinner ft. ambient petroleum byproduct toward a more harmonious farming is more concrete. but is it more realistic? without leaving omnivorousness behind, can we supply the demand in a more ethical way, or is it too high?
note: 70386 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/bin/tootstream", line 11, in
load_entry_point('tootstream==0.3.1', 'console_scripts', 'tootstream')()
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/click-6.7-py3.5.egg/click/core.py", line 722, in call
return self.main(args, kwargs)
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/click-6.7-py3.5.egg/click/core.py", line 697, in main
rv = self.invoke(ctx)
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/click-6.7-py3.5.egg/click/core.py", line 895, in invoke
return ctx.invoke(self.callback, ctx.params)
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/click-6.7-py3.5.egg/click/core.py", line 535, in invoke
return callback(args, **kwargs)
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tootstream-0.3.1-py3.5.egg/tootstream/toot.py", line 1566, in main
File "/home/nydel/ve/dev/tootstream/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tootstream-0.3.1-py3.5.egg/tootstream/toot.py", line 1015, in note
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
(tootstream) nydel@foresee:~/ve/dev/tootstream$
the very next note that would be displayed is the "blank notification"