Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Hard to say for sure where is the issue - in AForge.NET framework or in the
Lego NXT. If AForge.NET sends command to NXT successfully and NXT replies
without errors, then it is a problem of NXT in my opinion - if it does not do
what it was instructed to do, then bug of NXT.
I've seen similar issues before. In my case it was caused only when setting low
power for motors. However if power is set higher, then motor starts moving
always.
Original comment by andrew.k...@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2011 at 8:11
I was using power = 70 which in my opinion isn't a small value. I also updated
FW to the newest available (1.29) and same issue exists. I will try set 100 and
see what will happen.
Sorry bothering again but what about Issue #196 and 2.1.6, any estimates on
release date? It could help me sniff the protocol and observe sent and received
values.
Original comment by krzysztof.blacha
on 28 Apr 2011 at 10:26
If you would like I can give you the build of current trunk, so you can work
with the latest version. However, I cannot say for sure about the next release
date. For now I am not sure 2.1.6 will be released, but 2.2.0 is planned, which
will have more features.
Original comment by andrew.k...@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2011 at 10:29
Please prepare custom release of current trunk for me. Thank you
Original comment by krzysztof.blacha
on 28 Apr 2011 at 12:25
Described in the application problem may be caused by wrong usage of NXT
protocol. Read this: "When we want the motor to execute a movement, we simply
send the correct string to the according mailbox. >>> The motor for the
specified port must be idle, i.e. it can't be carrying out any other movement
commands at the time when the new command arrives. If this should happen, the
NXT will indicate this erroneous user behavior by a signal (high and low beep)
and will drop (ignore) the message.<<<" and in my opinion is not related to
AForge implementation. Please close this issue.
Original comment by krzysztof.blacha
on 16 May 2011 at 12:32
This could be related to the issue as well:
http://www.aforgenet.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1263&p=2555&hilit=UPDATE_MODE
#p2554
Need to check about this UPDATE_MODE bit ...
Original comment by andrew.k...@gmail.com
on 16 May 2011 at 8:40
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
krzysztof.blacha
on 28 Apr 2011 at 12:21