Closed thoree closed 4 years ago
This behaviour is by design, since exclusionPower()
offers complete freedom in the specification of true
and claim
.
Both alternatives may have inbred founders (with the same or different coefficients), but this must be set individually for each.
I'd be happy to clarify this in the docs, of course. Do you have a formulation suggestion?
The sentence (in Details) " Both alternatives may have inbred founders (with the same or different coefficients), but this must be set individually for each." would clarify this for me.
Thore
man. 15. jun. 2020 kl. 11:16 skrev Magnus Dehli Vigeland < notifications@github.com>:
This behaviour is by design, since exclusionPower() offers complete freedom in the specification of true and claim.
Both alternatives may have inbred founders (with the same or different coefficients), but this must be set individually for each.
I'd be happy to clarify this in the docs, of course. Do you have a formulation suggestion?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/magnusdv/forrel/issues/37#issuecomment-644008818, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACSUNB4BGGOMLRYMKGHQ7STRWXRFPANCNFSM4N57AHZQ .
It appears that founder inbreeding must be specified for the
true
alternative inexclusionPower
as the below example shows. Perhaps a clarification is in place in the documentationCreated on 2020-06-15 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)