ZeroVer's patent-pending zero-based versioning
scheme can obviously be used by everyone, but not every usage is
necessarily notable. Check that the first and at least one other
criterion apply:
[X] A current ZeroVer-compliant version (0.*) or long history of ZeroVer usage, and
long history of zero version usage. Notably went from 0.23.0 -> 24.0.0. I don't know if there are other projects that have shamelessly replaced their major version with their minor version while seceding from the honorable ZeroVer community.
[X] Very wide exposure (i.e., 1,000+ GitHub stars), or
[X] Active promotion as part of a paid product or service (e.g., Hashicorp Vault), or
If you consider Imply's marketing and conference active promotion: https://druidsummit.org/
[ ] Relative maturity and infrastructural importance (e.g., Compiz, docutils)
I would say yes on maturity but I am hesitant to imply infrastructural importance
Basic info
Project name: Apache Druid Project link: https://druid.apache.org/
Qualifications
ZeroVer's patent-pending zero-based versioning scheme can obviously be used by everyone, but not every usage is necessarily notable. Check that the first and at least one other criterion apply:
0.*
) or long history of ZeroVer usage, and long history of zero version usage. Notably went from 0.23.0 -> 24.0.0. I don't know if there are other projects that have shamelessly replaced their major version with their minor version while seceding from the honorable ZeroVer community.Additional notability info
https://imply.io/blog/introducing-apache-druid-24-0/ I would say the project's upgrade to 24.0.0 from zero ver was promoted heavily.
Citation info