Open nheeren opened 5 years ago
Guillaume and Niko,
We (in the editorial office) are looking at all the logistical issues related to data requirements/badges. This suggestion is a good one, but we need to figure out how best to make it work in ScholarOne.
Thanks, Reid
From: Niko Heeren notifications@github.com Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 3:18 AM To: majeau-bettez/opendata_jie opendata_jie@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [majeau-bettez/opendata_jie] Facilitating review of data badges and also minimal requirements (#9)
When reviewing the compliance of submissions for the data badges it is often very cumbersome to figure out where the data is located.
Therefore, I suggest we come up with a template spreadsheet that authors requesting a data badge have to fill out. An additional benefit would be that this "barrier" makes it clear to authors the "I request a data badge" checkbox should not be clicked for fun (only).
Examples:
Having such a template for the minimum requirements would be great too, but I feel like we will be causing too much hassle.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmajeau-bettez%2Fopendata_jie%2Fissues%2F9%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DAIWTOIN7GXMBMEQRECEFTZ3QGN7RTA5CNFSM4IPMTGAKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HHJZYWA&data=02%7C01%7Creid.lifset%40yale.edu%7Cf12576e3777c4be8abda08d729f57e96%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637024006686492098&sdata=o%2B4VWMUUXkGFFZ3QTq4%2BPZg%2BW%2FTRHj17fniUIZ40GOk%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAIWTOINBYRKHLLQMEBBEAR3QGN7RTANCNFSM4IPMTGAA&data=02%7C01%7Creid.lifset%40yale.edu%7Cf12576e3777c4be8abda08d729f57e96%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637024006686502091&sdata=KjKXKnHNcvXBOsBrNc8o4DB07h%2Fz%2BiGscibUuktSy8Q%3D&reserved=0.
Sure we need to find a solution that works in S1. But wouldn't it be possible to ask authors to include a e.g. xlsx file into their submission?
How can we make progress on this? What is Guillaume's opinion?
Yes, but we need to decide how to do this, e.g., an email after submission (when an author has requested a badge)? During submission (i.e., within S1M)?
There is an annoying amount of detail involved if a useful routine is to be established. (The real issue is that other people in the editorial office are working furiously on getting new (slow) staff up to speed.)
From: Niko Heeren notifications@github.com Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 2:41 PM To: majeau-bettez/opendata_jie opendata_jie@noreply.github.com Cc: Lifset, Reid reid.lifset@yale.edu; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [majeau-bettez/opendata_jie] Facilitating review of data badges and also minimal requirements (#9)
Sure we need to find a solution that works in S1. But wouldn't it be possible to ask authors to include a e.g. xlsx file into their submission?
How can we make progress on this? What is Guillaume's opinion?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmajeau-bettez%2Fopendata_jie%2Fissues%2F9%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DAIWTOIIYR77CNKHAHVH5YXDQGQPSXA5CNFSM4IPMTGAKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5FIUBI%23issuecomment-524978693&data=02%7C01%7Creid.lifset%40yale.edu%7C9b40bff9bbf84cb954b708d72a54e8dc%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637024416489297526&sdata=axemmaYgTS86k%2B6by4jSjIZlFYTh7b9fqgM8ShA3F6Q%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAIWTOIL776VJUIKXO2HAVYLQGQPSXANCNFSM4IPMTGAA&data=02%7C01%7Creid.lifset%40yale.edu%7C9b40bff9bbf84cb954b708d72a54e8dc%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637024416489307520&sdata=p9m%2Bd1XSn%2BKo1vOI4ZVJP1cpMrkbraTvRwtpYz83I8Y%3D&reserved=0.
Maybe @majeau-bettez and I should already draft a template / questions that we deem useful and then we can see how to get this into the S1 processes?
When reviewing the compliance of submissions for the data badges it is often very cumbersome to figure out where the data is located.
Therefore, I suggest we come up with a template spreadsheet that authors requesting a data badge have to fill out. An additional benefit would be that this "barrier" makes it clear to authors the "I request a data badge" checkbox should not be clicked for fun (only).
Examples:
xxx
xxx
Having such a template for the minimum requirements would be great too, but I feel like we will be causing too much hassle.