Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Strange. I don't understand what those error messages mean. It looks like
regex.cpp
hasn't changed since 0.2.2 anyways. Do you have any more info about your system
or
version of CMake?
Original comment by jbe...@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2009 at 12:30
yeah sure:
cmake version 2.6-patch 4
GNU Make 3.81
Ubuntu 9.10 RC
Actually the information is not that accurate.
I forgot to mention that cmake works and completes. Just when I try to run make
i get
those errors.
Sorry about that.
Odd about regex not changing since 0.2.2.
I'll take a closer look later.
thx for the fast response.
Original comment by pandazero@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2009 at 12:42
I'm experiencing the exact same problem with this version of yaml. My system:
OS: Eeebuntu 3.0, 32-bit, 2.6.29-1
The steps and output is the same for me too. I'm now trying to use an older
release
and see if the problem still occurs.
Original comment by kuehne.lars@arcor.de
on 25 Oct 2009 at 7:02
I just successfully compiled yaml 0.2.2 so it seems to be a 0.2.3 problem only.
Hope
it helps.
Bye
Original comment by kuehne.lars@arcor.de
on 25 Oct 2009 at 7:08
I updated the CMakeLists.txt files - could you try the latest version (r288,
from the
svn repository)?
It appears that your OS is auto-generating these files `._whatever.cpp`, and
then CMake
is trying to compile them. Out of curiousity, could you post the entirety of
one of
those files?
Original comment by jbe...@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2009 at 6:04
Never mind, that's not the important fix. It turns out that there were hidden
files
named `._whatever.cpp` generated on my machine by OS X, based on "extended
attributes" in the filesystem. These hidden files didn't appear on my machine,
but
they did get bundled with the tarball. When I extracted the source on my machine
again, OS X automagically handled those extra files and I didn't see them, but
on a
non OS X-machine, they just appeared as sources, and then CMake included them
in the
build.
Anyways, I removed them all from the tarball, and posted a new version 0.2.4
(with
only these minimal changes). Please check that out and let me know if it works.
Original comment by jbe...@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2009 at 8:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pandazero@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2009 at 11:37