makerdao / community

Contains current and historical governance polls and executives used in the governance of the Maker Protocol. Previously contained a lot of other content which remains in the 'prior-cleanup' branch.
https://forum.makerdao.com/
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
193 stars 161 forks source link

Can we remove makerdao/community/tree/master/faqs? Since the old faqs are archived elseware in the repo. #962

Closed Davidutro closed 3 years ago

Davidutro commented 4 years ago

The FAQs are archived under /community/tree/master/content/en/faqs, is there a reason to have a double taking up space in the repository?

Proposal: remove makerdao/community/tree/master/faqs

twblack88 commented 4 years ago

if the plan was to deprecate them, I think this would be the other way around yeah? They live on master in Github but don't display on the content folder (the website).

Davidutro commented 4 years ago

The pages displayed here(https://community-development.makerdao.com/en/faqs/) are from /community/tree/master/content/en/faqs correct?

So if we want to keep those there, is there any reason we are keeping a second set in /community/tree/master/faqs ?

if the plan was to deprecate them, I think this would be the other way around yeah?

The plan is to not deprecate them for the foreseeable future but to have them available as archive.

They live on master in Github but don't display on the content folder (the website).

Don't they display from the content folder on the portal here?

twblack88 commented 4 years ago

The pages displayed here(https://community-development.makerdao.com/en/faqs/) are from /community/tree/master/content/en/faqs correct?

Correct

So if we want to keep those there, is there any reason we are keeping a second set in /community/tree/master/faqs ?

Reason: perhaps there is one but it's not documented. Probably a migration artifact. Good reason: no

twblack88 commented 3 years ago

@Davidutro I think we can keep these top-level folders for now. When we rewrite the readme they should make more sense and we can prune there. By rounding out the archive tag and where the front page links go, it should help us understand what needs to stay.