Closed kmbarry1 closed 4 years ago
Eh, unsure. They're constants, so that makes them rather uninteresting. Plus in a test it's better to put the explicit value you expect, rather than using what value the contract thinks it should. Arguably they shouldn't have been public.
Anyway, that's the melange of reasons floating in my head for why I didn't do it in the first place. But if this repo is supposed to just exactly match the entire public interface of each contract it catalogs, then sure, why not.
Looks good.
Would it be worthwhile to also add
burn()
,burnFrom()
, andmint()
(all returnbytes4
) here?