coderabbitai[bot]
commented
2 months ago Walkthrough
The recent update refines the date handling in the get_stripe_payment_intents function within the Stripe payment intent module. By switching to using the timestamp() method instead of timetuple(), the accuracy of date conversion for comparison is significantly improved.
Changes
| File Path | Change Summary |
|---|---|
api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py |
Modified get_stripe_payment_intents to utilize timestamp() for date conversion, enhancing accuracy. |
Recent Review Details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf3ac91789ebd800957d75883d057ff70f813efe and 43666c3d4e6a5ce2db5d3d8a0c44373dc8f7045e.Files selected for processing (1)
* api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py (1 hunks)Additional comments not posted (1)
api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py (1)
`209-210`: The change from using `timetuple()` to `timestamp()` for date conversion in `get_stripe_payment_intents` function is a positive improvement. This method provides more accurate and timezone-aware handling of timestamps, which is crucial for the correct processing of payment intents across different time zones. However, ensure that all other parts of the system that interact with this function are aware of this change, as it could affect how dates are compared elsewhere in the system.Verification successful
--- The executed script searched for the usage of the `timetuple()` method across Python files in the repository, excluding the `stripe_payment_intent.py` file. The search did not return any results, indicating that the `timetuple()` method is not used elsewhere in the system. This suggests that the change to using `timestamp()` in the `stripe_payment_intent.py` file is unlikely to cause compatibility issues with other parts of the system based on the method's usage. Given this information, it appears that the change to using `timestamp()` for date conversion in the `get_stripe_payment_intent` function is isolated and should not affect other components negatively. Therefore, the review comment is consistent with the codebase, and the change can be considered safe in terms of not conflicting with existing uses of `timetuple()`.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Verify that no other parts of the system use the old `timetuple()` method in a way that would be incompatible with this change. rg --type py 'timetuple()' --glob '!stripe_payment_intent.py' ``` Length of output: 63
Testcase didn't work because it called a function that converted timestamp from UTC to local TZ, so it missed the payment intents created during the test run.
Summary by CodeRabbit