Closed hrbu closed 9 years ago
I agree. I actually noted this down somewhere (found it: #58) but then forgot to implement it that way. Data container destruction should be opt-in only. Will get it in to 0.5.0 :)
Fixed as of 0.5.0; can pass in --include-data
to decking destroy
to remove data volumes. Other options are --include-persistent
(to delete any containers with a persistent: true
setting) and --include-volumes
:)
When calling
destroy <cluster>
, decking removes the data-containers that are defined as a"mount-from"
dependency.... means, in case of
destroy
my data-containerbase.coredatastore_volume
will be destroyed too.When calling
destroy
I'd prefer toWhat do you think?