Open hardingnj opened 5 years ago
Hi @hardingnj, just checking in here, are these still relevant, or have they been addressed already?
These are yet to do. Migrated from Alex's input plus a couple of other thoughts.
Hi @hardingnj. A few comments upon vobs-funestus
integration:
params.req
in the Snakefile to a separate cluster.json
config: syntax of memory requests is specific to cluster architecture, also memory required depends on the reference genome$(pwd)
instead of ${pwd}
in the submission command* suggest moving memory requirements from `params.req` in the Snakefile to a separate `cluster.json` config: syntax of memory requests is specific to cluster architecture, also memory required depends on the reference genome
Yes- good idea. I'm not sure exactly how to do this though? What were you thinking? Defining the mem requirements of each rule separately in cluster.json
?
* in my case, I had to use `$(pwd)` instead of `${pwd}` in the submission command
That's a typo. Originally I had ${PWD}
, alistair changed it to $(pwd)
. I didn't realise what he was doing, so changed it to ${pwd}
. Oops!
* maybe add X/autosomal ratio calculation to QC summary script?
We deliberately left this out as we can't assume which contigs/chromosomes will be present. Brandy is building with 1000s of contigs.
Got it!
Yes, setting memory req's per rule would make sense, as contamination estimation needs significantly more RAM than other rules
${PWD}
case in readme