Open smathy opened 10 years ago
I agree to clarify the category of gems. However, I don't think that a namespace is a good way of that. I guess few one will benefits even if I added just a line:
module Acme; module DoubleHelix; end; end
to this code.
Rather, RubyGems should have the feature. It would be very good if the category information is included in gemspec and if we can filter gems with category specified:
gem search -c acme
So, you want to change RubyGems rather than namespace your gem?
Hi,
I created the "Acme" namespace here in the Ruby world for just such gems as yours. Would you consider republishing it under the
Acme::DoubleHelix
name?We already have:
Acme::Bleach
,Acme::Heisenberg
andAcme::Leeway
all in the tradition of Perl's Acme::* libs. All of which are listed as requirements of the baseAcme
gem for simple install.If you're not interested, no problem, I'm happy to do the legwork for you, just thought I'd offer in case you were interested.