Classes 1.4.2 and 2.8.3 cover land undergoing rehabilitation in natural or agricultural contexts; could this be more consistently captured as a similar class within 3.9.0 ? Previous land use would then be needed to split out, say, industrial land rehab (petrol stations, gas plants, etc) from mining rehab.
For signifying land under a mining consent, it would seem more appropriate to capture consents of various kinds as an attribute side by side with tenure, and then capture the actual rather than intended use of the land at the time of observation.
Classes 1.4.2 and 2.8.3 cover land undergoing rehabilitation in natural or agricultural contexts; could this be more consistently captured as a similar class within 3.9.0 ? Previous land use would then be needed to split out, say, industrial land rehab (petrol stations, gas plants, etc) from mining rehab.
For signifying land under a mining consent, it would seem more appropriate to capture consents of various kinds as an attribute side by side with tenure, and then capture the actual rather than intended use of the land at the time of observation.