Closed maxqchen closed 9 years ago
ERMERGARD no checkstyle fails!
I think this is okay, but you'll want to test it first.
Updated with (hopefully) fix, added basic test.
Also I think there's a bug in FunctionTypeValueVertex, not sure though.
This seems right?? I'm kind of not thinking clearly right now, but I would like you to at least address the comments I did make before I review again.
Passing in edges and deleting the main graph node / edges as discussed.
This has a new diff if that didn't send out an email earlier.
Okay, I think this is fine now.
Cool. What do we need next? The scope name transformation code?
I was thinking about that last night -- the actual thing that is next is building function bodies. My PR for graph-building makes function values hold a subgraph instead of a list of expressions. Once that is ready, we can transform scope names (which I'm pretty sure interacts correctly with things like recursive function calls).
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Max Qitian Chen notifications@github.com wrote:
Cool. What do we need next? The scope name transformation code?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/manifold-lang/manifold-frontend/pull/63#issuecomment-80863521 .
Throwing up some code for PR first, will update PR with tests once the function itself is good :)