Closed cunningjames closed 5 years ago
@cunningjames This just has some lint errors that need to be fixed. I can take a look at reviewing this tomorrow as well. Thanks for contributing!
@cunningjames I merged another PR with the same feature. I'm gonna go ahead and close this one. v0.3 (which I'm about to release now) will have this change.
Add ability to specify additional parameters to RandomForestRegressor, with some minor error checking and two additional tests.
Options are passed in as dictionary argument rf_opts. n_estimators is ignored in favor of the argument to the constructor; oob_score is ignored and always set to True; warm_start is ignored (assumed to be False).
Two reasons this is helpful for me, at least: the random forest fit is often faster (particularly on my laptop) with n_jobs set to 1. I'm also hoping to investigate the shap interpretability package, but the underlying algorithms perform extremely poorly on deep trees, so the ability to specify max_depth would make that a bit easier.
This is a repeat of another pull request, closed by me, attempting to fix formatting issues that cause continuous integration to fail.