Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I get why you have submitted this patch, but is this a theoretical problem or
has someone run against this in a real world situation?
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2013 at 2:57
We have the problem in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706154#101 and the following
messages. gecko-mediaplayer is built against Firefox 17 (in unstable) but
testing still has Firefox 10. I also think this would fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gecko-mediaplayer/+bug/870115 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gecko-mediaplayer/+bug/1069635.
Original comment by s.ramac...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2013 at 7:54
I believe I am going to reject this patch on the following reasons
1. That code is from Mozilla, I prefer not to touch it
2. Running a plugin compiled for F17 in F10 is a mistake and I don't think that
should be supported
3. Chrome has had a horrible time supporting mozilla plugins and so I see no
reason to work around their problem code (they black listed my plugin for years
due to problems in their code)
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2013 at 2:23
JFTR: Looking at some of the plugin code shipped in Firefox, this seems to be
the preferred way now:
http://sources.debian.net/src/iceweasel/21.0-1/dom/plugins/test/testplugin/nptes
t.cpp#L672
Original comment by s.ramac...@gmail.com
on 23 Jun 2013 at 6:21
I put in some code to address this, see if it works. The patch you provided may
have generated exceptions in some instances.
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 23 Jun 2013 at 7:02
Oh, thanks. Indeed, I missed that setexception comes after getvalue. Thanks!
I'll let you knew as soon as I get some feedback.
Original comment by s.ramac...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2013 at 9:51
I checked the wrong pointer in the first patch. I'm not using
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/gecko-mediaplayer.git;a=blob;
f=debian/patches/functable-check.patch;h=3b7d9cc0c0af6374dcefad12d3e8ef1d50501e6
7;hb=HEAD
Original comment by s.ramac...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2013 at 11:02
I enhanced my patch abit and put it in SVN.
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2013 at 12:37
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 2 Aug 2013 at 12:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
s.ramac...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2013 at 7:31Attachments: