Closed philmmanjaro closed 6 years ago
@fhdk: can you check this one?
@philmmanjaro @jonathonf I think we need to add the x32 branches to the status.json and the mirrors.json - since pacman-mirrors selects mirrors based on updated status.
The functionality of pacman-mirrors is centered around the the updated status of the mirrors. But I see no problem in extracting the system architecture and then create a mirrorlist for that architecture.
The way I see it now is that the diskusage remain almost the same - it is the repo file structure which changes. I looks to me you keep the everything in the pool and just symlink the x86 in folders prepended with x32-
. It uses a little more diskspace but as I understand it those are only symlinks.
Pacman-mirrors can check with uname -m
and prepend the users branch with x32-
if not x86_64
uname -m
output on 32-bit system?what does uname -m output on 32-bit system?
i686
Released 4.7.0 to unstable
https://github.com/manjaro/pacman-mirrors/commit/4bc97e8eb083df90acc5ba42a219b22d4d6c8ac0
When we support manjaro32.org we should add the needed x32 branches supported by pacman-mirrors. See also: https://github.com/manjaro/release-plan/issues/174