search

mannyzhou5 / evolutionchamber

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/evolutionchamber
0 stars 0 forks source link

Use the SHA1 checksum shown to verify file integrity after an automatic update #154

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run an older version of EC
2. Perform the update when prompted
3. Observe the process

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The downloaded file integrity should be verified with the provided SHA1 
checksum from the download page.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2010 at 8:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2010 at 8:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Are you working on this netprobe?  I could do this.

Original comment by mike.angstadt on 22 Nov 2010 at 8:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I was going to but it's hard to carve out a consistent chunk of time to code 
recently.
If you are willing to take on the task then I'm more than willing to pass it on 
to you as I see it as important.
By the way, a visual progress of the checksum would be nice and maybe 
consolidating the 'Checking for updates' window and the update progress window.
For a nice auto updater example see sc2gears 
(http://sites.google.com/site/sc2gears/).

Reassigning now :)

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2010 at 9:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I don't want to steal anything from you, I just wasn't sure if you were working 
on it. :) You made yourself the Owner of this issue, but I wasn't sure if that 
meant you were working on it or that you were just keeping an eye on it.  But 
I'd love to do it if you don't have the time.

Calculating the checksum takes only a split second, so we wouldn't need a 
progress bar for it.  But yeah, I did notice that the window that shows the 
download progress isn't sent to the foreground.  I'll make that another issue 
for that.

Original comment by mike.angstadt on 22 Nov 2010 at 10:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
You're not stealing the task! Think of It as freeing resources :D I wouldn't 
have time to even start it before the weekend so I'm really pleased that you 
came forward with the proposition :)
By the way. Big kudos for coding up the first unit tests for the project!

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2010 at 10:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Ok cool. :)

Original comment by mike.angstadt on 22 Nov 2010 at 10:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Fixed in r132.

Original comment by mike.angstadt on 24 Nov 2010 at 2:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 24 Nov 2010 at 9:40