search

mannyzhou5 / evolutionchamber

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/evolutionchamber
0 stars 0 forks source link

Queens Larva Inject is 40 second duration #35

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Not 45.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by azzur...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Disregard that.
Only the first one after queen pops is 40 seconds...
Who of the developers came to the idea that queens should not be able to inject 
on cooldown because of energy? oO

Original comment by azzur...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
You are correct that the duration of spawn larva is 40 seconds. I'm not sure 
about the energy cool down. For me it seems that each spawn pops in 45 second 
durations. Does the energy cost really add 5 seconds to the timer?

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
To make it more clear. In my opinion EC spawns/pops larva every 45 seconds 
(even after the first pop).
In game the timer is 40 seconds. Is the current situation correct or is this an 
error. I find it hard to believe that as much as 5 seconds are lost due to 
energy cost.

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
It is an issue indeed, larva inject is 40 seconds.

Original comment by Quen.An...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
No I tested it. If you perfectly inject every time, you have to wait 4-5 ingame 
seconds for the energy.

Original comment by azzur...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 10:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Ok. So the conclusion for this issue is that the current implemented state is 
correct and the issue can be closed. Agreed?

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 11:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I'll treat lack of confirmation as a signal that my previous statement is 
correct.
I'm marking the issue as invalid - if someone disagrees then please comment on 
the issue - it will be reopened then.

Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2010 at 1:19