Fix: code issues from quality tools

manoelhc commented 6 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced a health check function for Docker containers.
- Enhanced user management with detailed validation and exception handling.
- Added a Conda environment configuration for the project.
Bug Fixes
- Updated CORS settings to dynamically use configuration values.
Documentation
- Updated README to remove redundant badges.
- Added comprehensive guidelines for contributing to the project.
- Enhanced API endpoint documentation in user router.
Refactor
- Updated Dockerfile for optimized package management and health checks.
- Refactored health check functionalities using configuration settings.
Tests
- Expanded test coverage for health checks and user-related operations.
Chores
- Updated development dependencies with specific versions.
- Integrated Codacy and TruffleHog for code quality and security checks.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 6 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits de839b4..b6579ab. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success	🎯 17 occurences resolved	View Check ↗
Test coverage	❌ Failure	❗ 11 occurences introduced 🎯 4 occurences resolved	View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	78.7% (down 4.1% from `main`)	78.7% (down 4.1% from `main`)
Condition Coverage	78.7% (down 4.1% from `main`)	78.7% (down 4.1% from `main`)
Composite Coverage	91.7% (down 0.1% from `main`)	91.7% (down 0.1% from `main`)
Line Coverage	94.6% (up 1.1% from `main`)	94.6% (up 1.1% from `main`)
New Branch Coverage	71.1%	71.1%
New Condition Coverage	71.1%	71.1%
New Composite Coverage	87.6%	87.6%
New Line Coverage	92%	92%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

codacy-production[bot] commented 6 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for de839b46829c34e3780e0677d2b06019796b12ad[^1]	:white_check_mark: 91.96%

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (de839b46829c34e3780e0677d2b06019796b12ad) | Report Missing | Report Missing | Report Missing | | | Head commit (b6579aba87982dff11efd3809039c25d574453a7) | 555 | 525 | 94.59% | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#10) | 286 | 263 | **91.96%** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation} [^1]: Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

codecov-commenter commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.66434% with 41 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.63%. Comparing base (de839b4) to head (eec1111).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/test/test_docker_healthcheck.py	79.31%	20 Missing and 16 partials :warning:
src/docker_healthcheck.py	86.36%	1 Missing and 2 partials :warning:
src/app.py	33.33%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #10 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 92.23% 90.63% -1.61% ========================================== Files 8 10 +2 Lines 309 555 +246 Branches 29 61 +32 ========================================== + Hits 285 503 +218 - Misses 20 30 +10 - Partials 4 22 +18 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 6 months ago

Walkthrough

The project has been fortified with security measures, streamlined configurations, and enhanced documentation. Notable updates include Codacy integration for code coverage, secret detection with TruffleHog using Docker, refined Docker setups, updated dependencies, and improved code clarity and testing coverage.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/test.yaml`	Added Codacy Report step for code coverage uploads.
`.pre-commit-config.yaml`	Integrated TruffleHog for secret detection using Docker.
`README.md`	Removed redundant DeepSource badges.
`Dockerfile`	Updated packages, adjusted `COPY` paths, modified `HEALTHCHECK` and `CMD`.
`requirements-dev.txt`	Specified versions for development dependencies like `asyncio`, `httpx`, and `pytest`.
`src/.../app.py`, `config.py`	Updated to use configuration values, enhanced CORS settings.
`src/.../docker_healthcheck.py`, `migrations/__init__.py`, `models/user.py`, `routers/...`	Refactored code, added detailed docstrings, and enhanced error handling.
`src/test/...`	Expanded test coverage for health checks and user operations.
`justfile`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `conda/env.yaml`	Updated test execution commands, outlined contribution guidelines, and set up a Conda environment.

Poem

🐇✨ In the code's burrow, deep and wide, Changes hop — they cannot hide. Secrets guarded, bugs at bay, In tests and types, we trust and play. To the future, swift we race, With cleaner code, we set the pace. 🚀 🐇💻

Recent Review Details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eec1111826b642c4d3b1d8516af2df2eca307d23 and b6579aba87982dff11efd3809039c25d574453a7.

Files selected for processing (1)

* CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (4)

CONTRIBUTING.md (4)
`22-22`: Consider adding a brief explanation of what "forking the repository" entails for newcomers. --- `25-25`: Clarify the location of `conda/env.yaml` to avoid confusion, especially for new contributors. --- `29-29`: Consider explaining the significance of branch naming conventions (`feat/`, `fix/`, etc.) to help new contributors understand their purpose. --- `31-31`: Suggest adding a step to ensure all tests pass before committing changes, enhancing the quality assurance process.

--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.