manoelhc commented 1 month ago

Summary by Sourcery

Update the auto-tagging behavior in the CI workflow to include additional paths for triggering and modify the BUMP_PATCH regex to include 'chore(deps)' pattern.

CI:

Update auto-tagging workflow to include additional paths for triggering.
Modify BUMP_PATCH regex to include 'chore(deps)' pattern.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Enhanced GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on additional file modifications, including source code and configuration files.
- Updated version bumping logic to recognize dependency updates in commit messages.

These improvements will lead to a more responsive and accurate version management process.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The recent modifications enhance the GitHub Actions workflow by broadening the set of monitored files and refining the conditions for version bumps based on commit messages. New paths in the trigger settings ensure that changes to key project files initiate the workflow. Additionally, the regex for recognizing patch version triggers has been updated to include dependency updates, improving the workflow's ability to categorize changes accurately.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/auto-tagging.yaml`	- Expanded `on.push.paths` to include `src/**`, `.env.local`, `requirements.txt`, and `requirements-dev.txt`.
	- Updated `env.BUMP_PATCH` regex to incorporate `^chore$deps$:\|fix\|hotfix\|ci)+($[-A-Z0-9a-z]+$)?:(.*)+$`.

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the auto-tagging behavior in the CI workflow. The changes include adding new paths that will trigger the workflow and modifying the BUMP_PATCH regex to include 'chore(deps):'.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
`.github/workflows/auto-tagging.yaml`	Enhanced the auto-tagging workflow by adding new paths to trigger the workflow and updating the BUMP_PATCH regex.

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 3b7e45d..9f09a5f. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Condition Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Composite Coverage	96.2%	96.2%
Line Coverage	97.5%	97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codacy-production[bot] commented 1 month ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (3b7e45db45af9dc58c21324dfba40ada1499029a) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (9f09a5f8e4a214ecc5cf9e4571454a1e1367fb34) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#131) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (3b7e45d) to head (9f09a5f).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #131 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.81% 97.81% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 411 411 Branches 76 76 ======================================= Hits 402 402 Misses 9 9 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

manoelhc / test-actions

chore(ci): Change the auto-tagging behavior #131