manoelhc commented 1 month ago

Summary by Sourcery

Fix Docker command in CI/CD pipeline script to ensure compatibility with the latest Docker CLI.

CI:

Update Docker command in CI/CD pipeline script to use 'docker compose' instead of 'docker-compose'.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Updated the command for running the application in the CI/CD pipeline to align with current Docker practices. Users should ensure they have the latest version of Docker compatible with this command.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The primary change involves updating the command for launching the application in a CI/CD pipeline from docker-compose up -d to docker compose up -d. This modification signifies a transition to the newer integrated Docker command structure that simplifies the usage of Compose features. Users accustomed to the old syntax may need to adjust their workflows, ensuring compatibility with the latest Docker version.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
justfile	Updated the command from `docker-compose up -d` to `docker compose up -d`

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 54603d0..2b453e6. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Condition Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Composite Coverage	96.2%	96.2%
Line Coverage	97.5%	97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Docker command in the 'run-ci' target within the justfile to use the correct syntax for Docker Compose v2. The change ensures compatibility with the newer version of Docker Compose.

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

codacy-production[bot] commented 1 month ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (54603d07568ce8b8710298081619567229523571) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (2b453e65617f02eb8e81d3b36ee77bedcd067099) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#132) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`