search

manoelhc / test-actions

Test actions
MIT License
1 stars 2 forks source link

fix: remove distroless image #18

Closed manoelhc closed 4 months ago

manoelhc commented 4 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile update includes an upgrade to the Python image versions, a switch to a less privileged user (nobody), and a modification in the execution command to directly run a Python script. This enhances both the security and the efficiency of the Docker container setup.

Changes

File Summary of Changes
Dockerfile Updated Python image versions, changed user to nobody, modified CMD to run Python script directly

Poem

🐇💻 A hop through the code, changes anew,
🌟 In Docker's land, a fresh brew.
From Python's grace, a version leap,
With nobody safe, security we keep.
Run the script, let it unfurl,
In Docker's world, a new pearl. 🌍✨

Recent Review Details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49c63af4541c85195db462d3460ed344e28b81f0 and d9a9625be8ec954aed8e98f65f9aa7d9cd941fe7.
Files selected for processing (1) * Dockerfile (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
Dockerfile (3)
`2-2`: Ensure the Python image SHA is the latest and most secure version.
Verification successful --- The verification process has successfully identified the latest SHA digests for the Python 3.12.0 image on the amd64 architecture. The SHA values obtained are: - `sha256:ebfe61739a0e0c937dfe998a9838dcf5aa2a27700d63d2387dae896d1c5005c4` - `sha256:e38acf985cbe8b765fc63e068504affdb6e08242434bed549d8fce70f0075e57` - `sha256:551369bc93831ee5b248d266557efb5287d6a58c4ace82b0606ce2fc4b0b9e70` These should be compared with the SHA specified in the Dockerfile: - `sha256:c6751fa575260522ca11fbad88394e12cbe31d0d8951d3d29301192745a09aab` Since the SHA in the Dockerfile does not match any of the latest SHA values for the Python 3.12.0 image, it appears that the Dockerfile is not using the latest and most secure version of the Python image. This confirms that the review comment is correct in suggesting a verification and potential update of the Python image SHA.
Scripts Executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Fetch the latest SHA for Python images and compare with the current SHA in the Dockerfile. curl -s 'https://registry.hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/python/tags/' | jq '.results[] | select(.name=="3.12.0") | .images[] | select(.architecture=="amd64") | .digest' ``` Length of output: 177 --- --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # First, check if the tag "3.12.0" exists for the Python image curl -s 'https://registry.hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/python/tags/?page_size=100' | jq '.results[].name' # If the tag exists, fetch the SHA for the "3.12.0" tag specifically to ensure the query is correct curl -s 'https://registry.hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/python/tags/3.12.0' | jq '.images[] | select(.architecture=="amd64") | .digest' ``` Length of output: 2118
--- `26-26`: Switching to `USER nobody` enhances security by limiting container process permissions. --- `28-28`: Direct execution of the Python script in `CMD` simplifies the startup process.
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 4 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 49c63af..d9a9625. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePython
Branch Coverage78.7%78.7%
Condition Coverage78.7%78.7%
Composite Coverage91.7%91.7%
Line Coverage94.6%94.6%
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
codacy-production[bot] commented 4 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark: ∅
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (49c63af4541c85195db462d3460ed344e28b81f0) | 555 | 525 | 94.59% | | | Head commit (d9a9625be8ec954aed8e98f65f9aa7d9cd941fe7) | 555 (+0) | 525 (+0) | 94.59% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#18) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 90.63%. Comparing base (49c63af) to head (d9a9625).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #18 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.63% 90.63% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 555 555 Branches 61 61 ======================================= Hits 503 503 Misses 30 30 Partials 22 22 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.