chore: Add lcov report file

manoelhc commented 3 months ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Enhanced the CI test command to include LCOV coverage reporting, improving visibility into code coverage metrics.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

The update primarily enhances the test-ci command in the justfile by appending an additional coverage report format. This modification ensures that along with the existing XML coverage report, a Line Coverage (LCOV) report is also generated when running pytest. This enhancement aids in providing a more comprehensive analysis of code coverage, beneficial for continuous integration environments.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
`justfile`	Added `--cov-report=lcov` to the `test-ci` command for `pytest`.

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits d044777..804f8c5. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Condition Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Composite Coverage	96.2%	96.2%
Line Coverage	97.5%	97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (d0447775f78d15f6756f0b8cad8d3e79accaabbd) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (804f8c5af298e4f3af8b5395d5a136120c185315) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#45) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy will stop sending the deprecated coverage status from June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (d044777) to head (804f8c5).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #45 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 96.06% 97.81% +1.74% ========================================== Files 10 10 Lines 407 411 +4 Branches 33 76 +43 ========================================== + Hits 391 402 +11 + Misses 10 9 -1 + Partials 6 0 -6 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.