manoelhc / test-actions

Test actions
MIT License
1 stars 2 forks source link

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0 #57

Closed manoelhc closed 3 months ago

manoelhc commented 3 months ago

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

#### Changes included in this PR - Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version: - requirements.txt #### Vulnerabilities that will be fixed ##### By pinning: Severity | Issue | Breaking Change | Exploit Maturity :-------------------------:|:-------------------------|:-------------------------|:------------------------- ![medium severity](https://res.cloudinary.com/snyk/image/upload/w_20,h_20/v1561977819/icon/m.png 'medium severity') | Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
[SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867](https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867) | No | No Known Exploit Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded. Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project. --- **Note:** _You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs._ For more information: ๐Ÿง [View latest project report](https://app.snyk.io/org/manoelhc/project/d3d0db63-1889-4e32-9b5b-dd6578f5da26?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr) ๐Ÿ›  [Adjust project settings](https://app.snyk.io/org/manoelhc/project/d3d0db63-1889-4e32-9b5b-dd6578f5da26?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr/settings) ๐Ÿ“š [Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic](https://support.snyk.io/hc/en-us/articles/360003891078-Snyk-patches-to-fix-vulnerabilities) [//]: # 'snyk:metadata:{"customTemplate":{"variablesUsed":[],"fieldsUsed":[]},"dependencies":[{"name":"requests","from":"2.31.0","to":"2.32.0"}],"env":"prod","issuesToFix":[{"exploit_maturity":"No Known Exploit","id":"SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867","severity":"medium","title":"Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation"}],"prId":"9e5d6caf-11f9-42c5-b660-d1359d383d84","prPublicId":"9e5d6caf-11f9-42c5-b660-d1359d383d84","packageManager":"pip","priorityScoreList":[null],"projectPublicId":"d3d0db63-1889-4e32-9b5b-dd6578f5da26","projectUrl":"https://app.snyk.io/org/manoelhc/project/d3d0db63-1889-4e32-9b5b-dd6578f5da26?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr","prType":"fix","templateFieldSources":{"branchName":"default","commitMessage":"default","description":"default","title":"default"},"templateVariants":["updated-fix-title"],"type":"auto","upgrade":[],"vulns":["SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867"],"patch":[],"isBreakingChange":false,"remediationStrategy":"vuln"}' --- **Note:** _This is a default PR template raised by Snyk. Find out more about how you can customise Snyk PRs in our [documentation.](https://docs.snyk.io/scan-using-snyk/snyk-open-source/automatic-and-manual-prs-with-snyk-open-source/customize-pr-templates-closed-beta)_ **Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:** ๐Ÿฆ‰ [Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.](https://learn.snyk.io/?loc=fix-pr)
coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review Skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
socket-security[bot] commented 3 months ago

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub โ†—๏ธŽ

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
pypi/docker@7.1.0 None 0 0 B
pypi/requests@2.32.2 environment, eval, filesystem, network, shell, unsafe 0 473 kB Lukasa, graffatcolmingov, nateprewitt

๐Ÿšฎ Removed packages: pypi/docker@7.0.0, pypi/docker@7.0.0, pypi/requests@2.31.0, pypi/requests@2.31.0

View full reportโ†—๏ธŽ

deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits e128567..6eed0be. View details on DeepSource โ†—.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPythonโœ… SuccessView Check โ†—
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverageโœ… SuccessView Check โ†—

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePython
Branch Coverage87.9%87.9%
Condition Coverage87.9%87.9%
Composite Coverage96.2%96.2%
Line Coverage97.5%97.5%

๐Ÿ’ก If youโ€™re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Tag v (branch: main, SHA: 4e1d849) Added.

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark: โˆ…
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (e1285678f409921312741541369900e10c4a3893) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (6eed0beb8cd25752c84506f741474fa5355b0c7f) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#57) | 0 | 0 | **โˆ… (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy will stop sending the deprecated coverage status from June 5th, 2024. Learn more

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (e128567) to head (6eed0be). Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #57 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.81% 97.81% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 411 411 Branches 76 76 ======================================= Hits 402 402 Misses 9 9 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.