manoelhc commented 1 month ago

Description

Added Qodana workflow configuration to run Qodana scan on pull requests and pushes to specific branches.
Configured job to run Qodana scan using JetBrains/qodana-action.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

qodana.yaml

Added Qodana workflow configuration and scan job

.github/workflows/qodana.yaml ['Added Qodana workflow configuration', 'Defined workflow triggers for pull requests and pushes to specific branches', 'Configured job to run Qodana scan using JetBrains/qodana-action']

+26/-0

Summary by Sourcery

Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow to integrate Qodana code quality scans, triggered on pushes to main, master, and release branches, as well as on pull requests.

CI:
- Added a new GitHub Actions workflow configuration file 'qodana.yaml' to run Qodana scans on specified branches and pull requests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Added a workflow for Qodana code analysis to improve code quality checks on specified branches and pull requests.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The new changes introduce a GitHub Actions workflow for Qodana code analysis. This workflow, defined in .github/workflows/qodana.yaml, automates the process of running Qodana scans on specified branches and pull requests, leveraging the JetBrains/qodana-action to ensure code quality and compliance.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/qodana.yaml`	Added a new workflow to run Qodana code analysis on specified branches and pull requests using JetBrains/qodana-action.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub
    participant Qodana Action
    participant Qodana Server

    Developer->>GitHub: Push code / Open PR
    GitHub->>Qodana Action: Trigger Qodana workflow
    Qodana Action->>Qodana Server: Run Qodana scan
    Qodana Server-->>Qodana Action: Return scan results
    Qodana Action-->>GitHub: Report scan results
    GitHub-->>Developer: Display scan results in PR

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits a06b5fa..da6ffe5. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Condition Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Composite Coverage	96.2%	96.2%
Line Coverage	97.5%	97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow configuration file named 'qodana.yaml'. The workflow is designed to run Qodana, a code quality analysis tool, on specified branches and pull requests. The implementation includes setting up the workflow triggers, job configurations, and necessary permissions.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
`.github/workflows/qodana.yaml`	Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for running Qodana code quality analysis on specified branches and pull requests.

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://sourcery.ai/dashboard): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are focused and well-documented.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Add a concurrency strategy to the 'Qodana Scan' job to manage parallel executions ___ Consider adding a strategy to limit the concurrency of the 'Qodana Scan' job to prevent potential resource constraints or conflicts. [.github/workflows/qodana.yaml [12-13]](https://github.com/manoelhc/test-actions/pull/89/files#diff-6d8d8d2ad214ea39e98820ca0b20fff0ba33f00decb5c7acea4dc06497d459beR12-R13) ```diff -11 +jobs: 12 + qodana: 13 + runs-on: ubuntu-latest +14 + strategy: +15 + fail-fast: false +16 + matrix: +17 + max-parallel: 1 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a concurrency strategy can prevent resource constraints and conflicts during job execution.	8

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Tag v (branch: main, SHA: 2f0e3f5) Added.

codacy-production[bot] commented 1 month ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (a06b5fa51c5b53365168832d6bb178ab1ae47b22) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (da6ffe55394307159596f9cad72f0ae5f9d1c1e1) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#89) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.}

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (a06b5fa) to head (da6ffe5).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #89 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.81% 97.81% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 411 411 Branches 76 76 ======================================= Hits 402 402 Misses 9 9 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions