manoelhc commented 3 months ago

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

qodana.yaml

Updated Qodana workflow with new actions/checkout version

.github/workflows/qodana.yaml ['Updated the `actions/checkout` version from `v3` to `v4`.', 'Modified the `fetch-depth` to `0` for full history in pull request analysis.']

+1/-1

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow to use a newer version of the checkout action and adds a Qodana configuration file to initialize the linter.

Build:
- Added qodana.yaml configuration file to initialize Qodana linter with version 1.0 and jetbrains/qodana-python-community:2024.1.
CI:
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use actions/checkout@v4 for better compatibility and performance.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use actions/checkout@v4 for improved performance and security.
- Introduced qodana.yaml for JetBrains Qodana linter configuration, enhancing code quality checks.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the repository involve two main changes. Firstly, the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file qodana.yaml has been updated to use version v4 of the actions/checkout action, enhancing the workflow's functionality. Secondly, a new qodana.yaml file has been introduced, which includes versioning information and specifies the linter configuration for JetBrains Qodana Python Community version 2024.1.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/qodana.yaml`	Updated `actions/checkout` action from `v3` to `v4`
`qodana.yaml`	Introduced new file with versioning information and JetBrains Qodana Python Community linter configuration

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow to use a newer version of the checkout action and adds a new Qodana configuration file for Python code analysis.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
`.github/workflows/qodana.yaml` `qodana.yaml`	Updated the GitHub Actions workflow and added a Qodana configuration file for Python code analysis.

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://sourcery.ai/dashboard): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 months ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 2f0e3f5..3d2ed4b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Condition Coverage	87.9%	87.9%
Composite Coverage	96.2%	96.2%
Line Coverage	97.5%	97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Tag v0.13.2 (branch: main, SHA: 8a4c265) Added.

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and well-documented in the description.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 months ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Add a `name` field to the new step in the workflow ___ Consider adding a `name` field to the new step for clarity and better organization. [.github/workflows/qodana.yaml [16]](https://github.com/manoelhc/test-actions/pull/96/files#diff-6d8d8d2ad214ea39e98820ca0b20fff0ba33f00decb5c7acea4dc06497d459beR16-R16) ```diff - steps: -+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4 ++ - name: Checkout code ++ uses: actions/checkout@v4 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a `name` field to the step enhances clarity and organization in the workflow. It's a good practice to provide descriptive names for steps in workflows.	8

github-actions[bot] commented 3 months ago

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (2f0e3f53969c3cb48418867e980cf92a23af09f9) | 407 | 397 | 97.54% | | | Head commit (3d2ed4baca95a3ab1f7226dbdcabe26f152a2043) | 407 (+0) | 397 (+0) | 97.54% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#96) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.}

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (2f0e3f5) to head (3d2ed4b).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #96 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.81% 97.81% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 411 411 Branches 76 76 ======================================= Hits 402 402 Misses 9 9 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

manoelhc / test-actions

fix(qodana): Add qodana init #96