manolkalinov / mactype

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/mactype
0 stars 0 forks source link

No difference between 100 and 300 font weight in Web Fonts #80

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Go to this page http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Lato
and you'll see that 100 and 300 fonts are similar. On Mac there is difference.

Comparison screen shot is attached.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dnevoz...@gmail.com on 23 Aug 2013 at 12:52

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
They are the actually the same weight in windows whether you believe or not~

Original comment by flyingsn...@gmail.com on 30 Aug 2013 at 3:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
windows only defined several weight "levels" as you can see from font selection 
dialog refered as "light regular bold" and some others I can't remember right 
now.
And only few fonts support all of them.

In windows, font weights in a predefined range will be treated as the same 
level. although freetype can render every weight separately as mac os does, 
mactype has to obey font weight level in order to simulate windows cleartype to 
output similar visual result.

Original comment by flyingsn...@gmail.com on 30 Aug 2013 at 4:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I don't think it's Windows fault. I've been using these (Lato, OpenSans with 
various weights, from 100 to 500 etc) but when I installed MacType it all 
changed. Weird thing is that the problems is with Chrome and Firefox whereas IE 
display them correctly. Seee the screenshot of another font with wide range of 
weight (Roboto  - http://www.google.com/fonts#UsePlace:use/Collection:Roboto 
)below

Original comment by l...@lanooz.net on 22 Sep 2013 at 2:14