search

manox14 / arora

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/arora
0 stars 0 forks source link

http://www.staylace.com is not rendered #697

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?

Enter http://www.staylace.com in the location window or click on a link or
bookmark to the same site

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expect to see the web page displayed, actually see
"Unknown error

When connecting to: http://www.staylace.com/."

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Using arora 0.10.1 on Linux -- (a) From the Ubuntu repositories under
Karmic and (b) On Pardus 2009 using the package from the arora website.

Please provide any additional information below.

Other framed sites such as: http://helio2.estec.esa.nl/ulysses do render
correctly, as does the unframed staylace site
http://www.staylace.com/fn_index.htm

I think the problem is arora rather than webkit since rekonq can display
the site.

N.B. the site may be considered not safe for work.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jtap...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 2:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hmm I am seeing the same thing in Arora, FireFox, and Safari.  A "Welcome to 
the home of staylace.com"

Original comment by ice...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 3:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
scratch that, I typed in staylace.com, not www.staylace.com

Original comment by ice...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 3:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Sadly the problem is that the site does not send a ContentType header so we do 
no know for sure that it is html.

Original comment by ice...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 4:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
http://github.com/Arora/arora/commit/f83796a6a2e79ddd4a02de19c6f61502924a69ec

Original comment by ice...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 4:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Thank you for solving the problem so quickly.

I'll prod the website owner about the missing ContentType header as a matter of
principle.

Original comment by jtap...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 4:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
thanks

Original comment by ice...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 5:35