Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Can't you include the manifest file in the setup manually. Most setup programs,
including VS, have an option to include additional files in the install
directory.
You can even automate the process by using setup scripts which are supported by
many
setup programs.
MH
Original comment by mehr...@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2008 at 1:27
I will try this; I was just thinking maybe I was doing something wrong and that
it
should be including it by default.
Original comment by murray.l...@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2008 at 4:25
It seems to work when I include the file manually. It seems rather bizarre that
this
step must be taken. Why would VS generate the appropriate manifest to allow the
built
application to be run without registration, but then not include this manifest
in the
setup project's installation?
Original comment by murray.l...@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2008 at 4:09
I agree, it does seem strange. However, I am glad that it worked.
MH
Original comment by mehr...@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2008 at 9:23
Hi...
Actually I have some issues regarding this topic ("Registeration-free
ComUtilities
COM interop") too... and I'd be more than happy if somebody would help me on
this.
First... when I followed general instructions for "RegFreeDemo" app...
everything
went fine (I tested on another PC with no COM registration from an USB stick -
all
files in a same folder).
But then... when I did the same for my project ("MyApp" instead of
"RegFreeDemo")...
this wouldn't work (I recreated also "MyApp.exe.manifest" file changing its
content
for compliance too). Am I missing something?
Regards, Cristi.
Original comment by xcrys...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2008 at 9:00
Ok, I found something on this...
It seems I should not have code in "FrmMain.OnLoad" that calls "Navigate()"
methods.
Otherwise will raise "InvalidCastException"
Original comment by xcrys...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2008 at 10:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
murray.l...@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2008 at 12:29