Closed DavidFair closed 1 year ago
NB: Richard says start with the Direct Beam iterator script first (https://github.com/mantidproject/mantid/issues/28986) as it will be easier!
See also #10892
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you feel this is incorrect please comment to keep it alive, with a reason why.
To prevent closure, e.g. for long-term planning issues, add the "Never Stale" label.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 6 months. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Allowing issues to close as stale helps us filter out issues which can wait for future development time. All issues closed by stale bot act like normal issues; they can be searched for, commented on or reopened at any point. If you'd like a closed stale issue to be considered, feel free to either re-open the issue directly or contact a developer. To extend the lifetime of an issue please comment below, it helps us see that this is still affecting you and you want it fixed in the near-future. Extending the lifetime of an issue may cause the development team to prioritise it over other issues, which may be closed as stale instead.
This issue has been closed automatically. If this still affects you please re-open this issue with a comment or contact us so we can look into resolving it.
Outstanding tasks as of 14/03/2023:
Background
parameter code - this parameter value is actually not used at all. In the code, the FlatTopPeak
algorithm is used for the peak fitting and this algorithm uses a hard-coded value as the background. We need to confirm what this parameter is actually doing and it's likely we should make this use the value passed in via the Background parameter. The other place in the code that uses a background value is if a Gaussian function is used to fit the peak, in which case another hard-coded value is used. However, while the code for Gaussian fitting is still in the script, we’re not actually using it so I think we could remove it.Other outstanding tasks have been moved to the following separate issues:
Original reporter: ISIS/Richard
Richard has been recently working on a local copy of the tube calibration scripts (
scripts/calibration
) and would like the changes merged back in and tidied up.Specifically, these changes work better where the resolution is bad. However, it has been changed with the horizontal tubes of SANS2D rather than the existing tubes (horizontal on MERLIN) in mind. So we need to check that it still produces sane results on instruments with horizontal tubes.
60330front_TEST_SCRIPT.py - Exercises the two below scripts tube_calib_RKH.py.txt tube_RKH.py.txt